Osteopathic Medicine: Systematic Reviews
Below you will find resources on writing systematic reviews. If you have questions, please contact your medical librarian, Daniel Ferrer (Harrogate campus) or Jacquelynn Stephens (Knoxville campus).
For any questions that cannot be answered here, please visit DCOM's Scholarly Activity and Research Page.
We also welcome book requests. If you would like to suggest a book, please send an email to one of the medical librarians above.
What Are Systematic Reviews?
Systematic reviews are a type of evidence synthesis in which authors develop explicit eligibility criteria, collect all the available studies that meet these criteria, and summarize results using reproducible methods that minimize biases and errors. Systematic reviews serve different purposes and use a different methodology than other types of evidence synthesis such as narrative reviews, scoping reviews, and overviews of reviews. Systematic reviews can address questions regarding effects of interventions or exposures, diagnostic properties of tests, and prevalence or prognosis of diseases.
All rigorous systematic reviews have common processes that include:
There are several tools that can guide and facilitate the systematic review process, but methodological and content expertise are always necessary.
A guide to performing systematic reviews of health and disease
by
